The
current concepts of gravity, mass and time as core elements within physics are not proven and not fully understood. Even Einstein was unable to provide us with a set of rules for unifying the core of physics. In the mind of the author this is because gravity has been totally misconceived. The theory of a Principal Force redefines gravity and explain a way of putting it "all"
together without the need for tweaks such as dark matter and dark energy.
Let's start with gravity as this is the core physics concept affected by the theory.
The idea that gravity is a kind of indefinite remote force where "masses" are pulled towards each other over vast distances seem unlikely as a physical phenomenon, even if we include Laplace fields and creative science. Especially if the universe originated from a type of "big bang" event or from a simplified initial state of the universe, where something made it "all" start expanding and forming into observable "waves/particles", planets and planetary systems. It all spells forces tearing stuff apart and stuff being forced away from each other, not being "pulled" together. Why would distant objects create a pull on each other in such a scenario?
The observant reader will of course rightfully say; We know for sure that there's gravity!
Surely, we are observing that an apple will "fall" to the ground and the moon circles the earth. We can hold a Mass in our hands and feel "gravity" - right?
Despite all this socially accepted and universally lectured understanding of gravity, there are many open questions regarding the correctness of the concept of gravity and many resources already claim that we do not understand gravity or that our understanding is not correct. Spacetime makes an attempt to explain gravity, and while the theory has been proven to be correct in several observations, it falls apart as it requires dark matter and dark energy to make sense on a cosmic scale.
For sure we do not have actual proof of gravity as a force as we do not understand how this force (as observed) is created (other than possibly Einstein's theories). There are many well documented objections that challenge the classic concept of gravity from many different sources. Anyone may seek these at their own discretion. If the Moon pulls on the Earth due to gravity, what is the pulling anchor? Soil, water, molecules, atoms, quantum particles or some magic "dark matter" within the Earth?
Nobody knows...
In the opinion of the author the indefinite and unlimited nature of gravity as explained in classic physics makes no sense whatsoever and common logic should dictate this. If a wave, particle, quantum/atomic wave/particle, or some sub-substance of the same is causing gravity, how come this "substance" can provide an unlimited amount of gravity pull to any number of other "substances" in any direction without any limitation? Also, gravity is assumed to pass through a galaxy without being affected to create a pull that is the same between objects regardless of where they are in the galaxy?
What other system in physics can provide an unlimited number of forces or effects in any direction to be applied with the same properties for all relationships? If an imagined quantum sub-particle for example is the anchor of a gravitational force, how can it provide this anchor and force to be relating to an indefinite number of other anchors? It simply does not add up.
The thesis herein claim
is that "gravity" is merely an observation of forces that appear to happen as a pulling force between "masses", while in fact it's not caused by pulling forces.
Another type of influence creates the "gravity" we know.
The Principal Force is in fact the "gravity"
we observe.
Fine, but why does the apple fall to the Earth?
Any object as explained in step 2 will have "shadows" of reduced Principal Waves "behind" the object as seen from the vantage point where the waves come from. In other words, there's reduced Principal Radiation in all directions from the object, compared to the radiation that is not affected by the object. This shadow will have relatively more effect and is more concentrated closer to the object.
Getting there!
So.... What happens when we observe two objects, like two apples, in a relative vicinity to each other?
The above illustration shows a state where each of the two objects are not in a state of equilibrium as they each create a shadow of reduced Principal Waves onto each other. This results in "the other" object receiving less Principal Force pushing waves. As a result, the objects will be "attracted" to each other as they are pushed towards each other from the imbalance of pushing forces resulting in an inbound force.
They are in other words being "accelerated" against each other, due to Principal Force waves pushing them together.
New rules and mathematics need to support Principal Force. The new mathematics will in order to find the pull between to objects also need to consider any intermediate "stuff". In the below illustration the pulling forces between object "X and "Z" will in classical physics only consider the masses of "X" and "Z" and the distance in between them (and "G").
In the mathematics of Principal Force the forces causing acceleration between "X" and "Z" needs to consider that the object "Y" increases the shadow effects that cause the inwards acceleration. The reason to why effects of this anomaly is not commonly known already is most likely due to the fact that the "gravity" measured and calculated is very small, especially for very distant objects. Also, for Einstein's general relativity there are "compensations" for relativity and spin to correct for these anomalies.
For galaxies and "large" astronomic systems the anomaly is very much known however, where "dark matter" needs to be added for the classical mathematics to have any meaning. In fact, any theory and formula that does not consider the "X-Y-Z" system shown below will not be able to produce correct results for object accelerations within the system.
The new Principal Force rules and mathematics will in the mind of the author easily be able to prove that the increased "gravity" in galaxies is caused by substantial Principal Force shadows and amplified accelerating forces especially in the "outskirts" of the galaxies.