While the thesis does not by any means attempt to discredit the discoveries and science of the scientists such as Newton, Planck, Maxwell, Einstein, Bohr and their likes, the reader should be open to consider the possibility that they in fact did get some things the wrong way around during their work. The reader should also keep in mind that their observations, modelling of physics and science work were indeed ground-breaking and crucial to the development of the current physics and the understanding of the universe.
Likewise, this thesis does not by any means try to dismiss known science and physics as we know it, as the intent is to improve and expand the understanding of the driving concepts behind most of the observations classical physics are built upon. The vast majority of the current science within areas such as physics and astronomy are based on theories and observations that in most cases will be supported by, and compatible with, the thesis. Still, the physics and concepts defining current physics may need to be re-considered in some cases in order to apply the concept of the thesis.
This thesis goal is to create a better understanding of the main physical concepts that may not be properly understood in classical physics today despite the consensus support they often have from the science communities.
While this thesis does contain statements that may be understood as fact claims, they are only claims within the scope of the thesis. The author do not claim any scientific background for the content herein, and in the case of any conflict with current scientific writings or others, the thesis shall be considered an alternative theory only.